Legal Opinion

Louis Theodore Frigard Miriam Claudia Frigard v. United States of America Central Intelligence Agency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1988No. 87-1906PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Per curiam

Louis and Miriam Frigard sued the United States because they believed that the CIA had misrepresented its participation in a company with which they had invested funds, causing them to lose their investment. The district court dismissed the complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

FACTS

The Frigards invested funds with Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham & Wong (“BBRDW”), an investment company. Because BBRDW mismanaged their investments, the Frigards lost about $310,000.

The Frigards filed this suit seeking damages against the United States and - the Central…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Central Intelligence Agency v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Kevin Cooper v. Michael RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Hart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. CraftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Freeman v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Qualls ex rel. Qualls v. Blue Cross of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API