Legal Opinion

Fulton v. New York City Police Department

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 23, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Amended judgment, entered February 7, 2005, to the extent appealed from, reversed, without costs, defendants’ motion to set aside the jury verdict on the false arrest claim granted and plaintiffs false arrest cause of action dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter a further amended judgment accordingly.

Defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on plaintiffs false arrest claim should have been granted. The existence of probable cause serves as a legal justification for an arrest and an affirmative defense to a false arrest claim (see Martinez v City of…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Martinez v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Rivera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Sital v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Gutierrez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API