Legal Opinion

Moulden v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 3, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

From final judgment adverse to plaintiff we consider the sufficiency of the declaration to state a cause of action. The plaintiff, an invitee, charges the defendant “did not then and there furnish the plaintiff with a safe floor on and over which to pass . . .” The declaration is defective.

This case was before this Court once before where it was said (Nettie Moulden v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Company, 143 Fla. 344, 196 So. 688) :

“If the owner of the building had been the insurer of the safety of the plaintiff as an invitee on its premises, there might be substance to this contention

T…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. J. G. Christopher Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Southern Express Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  3. Teston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  4. Turlington v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. Moulden v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matson v. Tip Top Grocery Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WylieSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. MarcotteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Charles H. Goldman v. Hollywood Beach Hotel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. Durden v. DranetzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API