Legal Opinion
Giles v. Dennison
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 3, 1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error from the District Court of Cleveland County; before C. F. Irv.'in, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Beauchamp, J.:
This is an action brought by the plaintiffs in error, in the district court of Cleveland county, as citizens and taxpayers of that county, to perpetually enjoin the defendants in error, as the board of county commissioners, from proceeding further in contracting for the construction of a court house and jail, and from creating a debt, expending money or making a tax levy therefor under the notice and advertisement for bids which had been published by order of the board, and reads:
“Notice to Architects and Contractors. — The board of county commissioners of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Bernier v. BernierSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- State v. StollSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Office Bldg. Commission v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Bulman v. McCraneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Haskins & Sells v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Heberer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Van Arsdale & Osborne v. Olustee School Dist. No. 35Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.