Legal Opinion
Stopford v. Haskell
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 22, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 6434PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. JOSEPH SMITH, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, a stockholder in Brunswick Worsted Mills, Inc., has brought a *510three count derivative suit alleging that the individual defendants as interlocking directors of the two corporate defendants, Brunswick and Carvill Combing Co., Inc. have so manipulated the business of Brunswick as to divert Brunswick’s assets to themselves and to Carvill in violation of their fiduciary-duty to the stockholders of Brunswick. The suit was originally instituted against the two corporate defendants and all of the directors of Brunswick as individual defendants. By consent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. ElbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dickinson v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Smith v. SperlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chambers v. Blickle Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. BlockTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Lawson v. Baltimore Paint and Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Chambers v. Blickle Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963