Legal Opinion
Rosas v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1993No. Docket Nos. C014083, C014491PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
In consolidated petitions for writ of review, the petitioners challenge the denial of workers’ compensation benefits for a waste water treatment worker who contracted hepatitis B. We have concluded substantial evidence does not support the decision of the respondent, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board), denying reconsideration of the order denying benefits. We shall therefore annul the Board’s decision.
I
Petitioner Manuel Rosas (Rosas) filed an application for adjudication of his claim for workers’ compensation benefits on December 17, 1987, alleging he suffered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- McAllister v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Southern California Rapid Transit District, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- S. Cal. Rapid Transit Dist. v. WORKERS'COMP. APP. BD.California Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madrid v. Lincoln County Medical CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Gaytan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003