Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Abascal

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided June 3, 1992No. 04-91-00511-CVPublished

1DissentButts, Justice

Did the trial court justly deny Hartford its day in court to present affirmative defenses solely on the basis that it objected to, but complied with, discovery? The majority holds that the trial court acted within its discretion. Because I believe this holding does not comply with the constitutional due process dictates of TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.1991), and a trial court does not have discretion to act other than by due process of law, I dissent.

Raul Flores, Jr., brought this workers’ compensation action claiming he suffered an injury when he fell at…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API