Legal Opinion

McInnis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1992No. 91-1674PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

605 So.2d 153 (1992)

James McINNIS, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-1674.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 9, 1992.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

2Per curiam

We affirm appellant's convictions and sentence with the exception that we remand with directions that the provision for restitution be stricken, or, alternatively, that an evidentiary hearing be conducted to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. State v. GetzSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Denmark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rudolf v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Filmore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. McInnis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Weeks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API