Legal Opinion
Perricone v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1984PublishedCited by 49 opinions
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The appeal in the action against defendant John T. Brady and Co. should be dismissed, without costs, and the order of the Appellate Division should otherwise he affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff does not, and cannot, seriously dispute that the Appellate Division’s order, insofar as it denied his motions concerning his action against John T. Brady & Co., is nonfinal. As a result, the appeal as against John T. Brady & Co. must be dismissed. (See Powell v Gates-Chili Cent. School Dist., 41 NY2d 827.)
As to the Appellate Division’s dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Winkelman v. H & S Beer & Soda Discounts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Chin v. HookerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by49 opinions
- Maria De Lourdes Torres v. Police Officer JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Giglio v. NTIMP Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Myers v. SlutskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Volpe v. Good Samaritan HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Bertan v. Richmond Memorial Hospital & Health CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.