Martin v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham; Person, J. Assumpsit by George B. Martin against Robert Smith, impleaded with M. D. Skinner, on a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Martin, being the owner of a promissory note given by M. D. Skinner to Robert Smith, and by him transferred to Martin by indorsement, left the same with the City National Bank of Lansing for demand and protest. The note was payable at the Ingham County Savings Bank of Lansing. This is an action brought by Martin upon this note. He recovered in justice’s court, and at the circuit upon certiorari. It is now brought to this court by writ of error, by Smith, the indorser. The errors alleged are: First, that a proper and legal demand was not shown; second, that the testimony did not support the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. HackleyNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Nichols v. GoldsmithNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Fisher v. KyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Forbes Lithograph Manufacturing Co. v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Hart v. Township of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mason v. LovinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Nelson v. GrondahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904