Legal Opinion

Gobble v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 30, 2013No. 111560PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRIAN JACK GOREE, Judge.

T1 We affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment in this premises liability case. The owner of the premises, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, did not owe a duty in connection with the operation of the crane involved in the accident, Although Chesapeake exercised some control over the schedule for completing the construction project, and the site plan designating the work zones, the instrumentality that caused the injury was a crane that was allegedly unreasonably dangerous. It is undisputed that the crane was neither owned nor controlled by Chesapeake.

12 After…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Sutherland v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Scott v. Archon Group, L.P.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. John C. Hull v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martinez v. Angel Exploration, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API