Legal Opinion · Dissent

Uphaus v. Wyman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 12, 1959No. 34Published

1DissentJustice Brennan, joined by The. Chief Justice, Justice Black and Justice Douglas

The Court holds today that the constitutionally protected rights of speech and assembly of appellant and those whom he may represent are to be subordinated to New Hampshire’s legislative investigation becausé, as applied in the demands made on him, the investigation is rationally connected with a discernible legislative purpose. With due respect for my Brothers’ views, I do not agree that a showing of any requisite legislative purpose or other state interest that constitutionally can subordinate appellant’s rights is to be found in this record. Exposure purely for the sake of exposure is not…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API