Legal Opinion · Dissent

Monongahela Power Co. v. Shackelford

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1952No. 10500Published

1DissentHaymond, Judge

The holding of the majority that under Code, 54-1-6, as amended by Chapter 60, Acts of the Legislature, 1949, Regular Session, the petition of the applicant in a proceeding in eminent domain to acquire an easement in land must describe the easement with such particularity that the court may determine that no more property is appropriated than is reasonably necessary for the purpose for which it is acquired, in effect requires the applicant definitely to restrict the width of the easement within fixed limits. In my opinion that holding is erroneous and from it I respectfully dissent.

As pointed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carnegie Natural Gas Co. v. SwigerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. State Road Commission v. BouchelleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Pittsburg Hydro-Electric Co. v. ListonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Brooke Electric Co. v. BeallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. West Virginia & Maryland Power Co. v. Racoon Valley Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API