Legal Opinion
Dible v. City of Chandler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2007No. 05-16577PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion By Judge FERNANDEZ; Concurrence By Judge CANBY.
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Ronald and Megan Dible appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment against them in their action against the City of Chandler, Arizona, the Chandler Police Department, and the Chandler Police Chief Bobby Joe Harris (collectively the City). Principally, the Dibles assert that Ronald Dible was a police officer whose rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution were violated when he was terminated for participating in (performing in, recording and purveying) a sexually explicit…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rankin v. McPhersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Dible v. City of ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dible v. City of ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Carboun v. City of ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Dible v. City of ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007