Legal Opinion

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. James Naugle, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lucinda Naugle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 6, 2016No. 4D14-1852PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM..

This is the third appearance of this case in this court. See Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Naugle, 103 So.3d 944 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“Naugle I”); Naugle v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 133 So.3d 1235 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (Naugle II). In Naugle I, we affirmed on the issue of liability1, but reversed for “a new trial on the issue of damages.” 103 So.3d at 949.

After the retrial on damages, the court interviewed the jury foreperson. The interview disclosed that, after the return of the verdict in the damages retrial, the foreperson received a text message from a second juror which indicated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. MalerSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Airvac, Inc. v. Ranger Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. NaugleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Sterling v. FeldbaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. City of Winter Haven v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. v. JAMES NAUGLE, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF LUCINDA NAUGLEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API