Legal Opinion

Molska v. Garfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), dated January 6, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The parties were involved in a motor vehicle accident on August 14, 2001. Joel H. Garfield commenced an action against Beata Molska in the Small Claims Part of the Village Justice Court of the Village of Mamaroneck to recover $3,000 for property damage to his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Omara v. PoliseAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
  2. Cohen v. BloomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Purnavel v. Tel-A-Car of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Czora v. Ahrens, New York County Courts1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Katzab v. ChaudhryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Schutte v. KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API