Legal Opinion
Elizabethtown Water Co. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 3, 1998No. Civ.A. 95-3326 (AMW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
Once again, this Court must review a motion for summary judgment in this case. Centennial Insurance Company (“Centennial”), defendant, has filed the current motion because exclusions in the insurance policies it issued to Elizabethtown Water Company (“Elizabethtown”), plaintiff, are the same as the one the Court based its grant of summary judgment for Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (“Hartford”), defendant. In particular, Centennial argues that the “contract liability” exclusions in its Comprehensive General Policies from 1987-88 and 1988-89 (“CGL Policy”) and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- MERCHANTS IND. CORP., OF NY v. EgglestonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Shebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Mariani v. BenderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wyndham Construction, LLC v. Columbia Casualty Insurance Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NUMBER MPL1757560.21 v. DROSOSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NUMBER MPL1757560.21 v. DROSOSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024