Legal Opinion

Ney v. Whiteley

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 5, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Petitions in the nature of quo warranto.

1Per curiam

These are petitions, brought by the democratic ward committees of the second, fifth, sixth, and tenth wards of the city of Providence, under the provision of chapter 263 of the General Laws, in the nature of quo warranto proceedings, to test the title of the wardens and clerks appointed by the board of canvassers and registration in said city, under the provision of section 4 of chapter 798 of Public Laws. So much of said section as applies to this is as follows:(2) “ At least ten days prior to every election there shall be appointed by the board of canvassers and registration of said city a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Webb v. CianciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  2. People Ex Rel. Turner v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Andrews v. StilesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
  4. Pueblo v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1920
  5. People v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API