Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 3, 2004No. 03-7176PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Larry Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, Judge) dismissing his pro se class action complaint.

In the complaint, Rodriguez seeks “equitable relief classwide for Kodak employees, past and present, whom have been harmed by [Kodak’s] discriminatory employment practices.” Although plaintiffs have a right to proceed pro se in civil actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1654, a pro se plaintiff may not seek to represent the interests of third-parties. See Iannaccone v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Iannaccone v. LawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Williams v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  2. Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Baker v. American Society of Composers, Authors and PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  4. Brewer v. BurnsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  5. Bruno v. AnnucciDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API