Legal Opinion
Dot Mort Holding Corp. v. Town of Mamaroneck
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtArthur D. Brennan, J.
On this motion, the defendants seek three items of relief. They move: (1) for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to rule 112 of the Buies of Civil Practice; (2) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice (these items (1) and (2) appear to he directed against the first cause of action alleged in the complaint); and (3) for a dismissal of the second cause of action alleged in the complaint, upon the ground that the same is legally insufficient, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice.
With respect to the first…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stevenson v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Altschul v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Platt v. New York & Sea Beach Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Western New York Water Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Litkind v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. Board of Assessment ReviewNew York Supreme Court · 1979