Legal Opinion
Honig v. Pacific Bank
California Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1887No. 11758PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
— This action is brought upon six certificates of deposit, made, executed, and delivered to the plaintiff by the defendant. They are all in the same words, except as to date and. amount. The following 'is a copy of the first issued: —
“$250. No. 3,289.
“Pacific Bank, N. W. cor. San some and Pine Streets—
Series B.
“ San Francisco, January 19, 1885. '
“ N. Honig has deposited in this bank two hundred and fifty dollars in gold coin, payable to self or order on the return of this certificate properly indorsed.
“ M. W. Upton, Teller.
“ S. Gr. Murphy, Cashier.”
The deposits were in fact made by one S. A.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morgan v. Bank of State of New YorkThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. RankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Brown v. DaughertyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri · 1903
- Lowrie v. S. SalzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Walker v. State Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Continental Nat. Bank v. NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.