Farkas v. Farkas
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArthur G. Klein, J.
The complaint in this action sets forth 4 causes of action against the defendant Farkas for separation, and 2 for declaratory judgment: the 5th, declaring that a divorce obtained by the defendant in Mexico is invalid; and the 6th, for a judgment annulling defendant’s marriage to the codefendant Francine Moss Glansrach. The first 4 causes of *828action are based, respectively, on abandonment, failure to support, cruel and inhuman treatment, and adultery.
The answer of the defendant Farkas consists of general denials. He also alleges as affirmative defenses: first, that plaintiff abandoned him, thus…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Mahaffey v. MahaffeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Farkas v. FarkasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966