Security Ins. Co. v. Vines

• RANDOLPH, J. .

Suit by appellee Tines against appellant on an insurance policy on his residence which was destroyed by fire. Judgment for appel-lee, and the company has appealed.

The principal question raised on the appeal is the alleged failure of the appellee to make proof of loss and, under the terms of the policy, that the suit was premature.

The evidence introduced by appellee upon that question is, substantially: That when the fire occurred appellee called up appellant's a'gent, H. AT. Harrell, and informed him of the destruction of his house by fire. The ■ agent then got in his car and…