Legal Opinion

Ahl Bros. Construction Co. v. Sciullo

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1959No. Civ. No. 17938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

The court has reviewed the pleadings in the light of the briefs and arguments of counsel on defendant Seaboard Surety Company’s motion to dismiss and is of the opinion that the motion should be denied. The law is clear that “ * * * there is no justification for dismissing a complaint for insufficiency of statement, except where it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim.” Continental Collieries v. Shober, 3 Cir., 1942, 130 F.2d 631, 635, and see 2 Moore’s Federal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Chicago Packaged Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Operative Bricklayer's Union No. 64 v. Bricklayer's Local Union No. 1District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API