Legal Opinion

Haines v. Department of Employment

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1954No. Civ. 8409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Appellants petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate directed against the department, compelling it to show cause why certain so-called arbitrary assessments it had made for unemployment insurance contributions claimed by it to be due and payable from appellants as employers pursuant to the Unemployment Insurance Act should not be canceled. Petitioners allege that, pursuant to the act, the department had on May 30, 1950, levied an arbitrary assessment against them for the reason “that no returns for contributions were filed by them”; that the assessment was on account of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perkins Manufacturing Co. v. Clinton Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Kos v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Los Angeles & West Side Transportation Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wayne v. Bureau of Private Investigators & AdjustersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Feldman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. York Healthcare & Wellness Ctr. LP v. State Dep't of Pub. HealthCalifornia Superior Court · 2019
  4. York Healthcare & Wellness Centre v. State Dept. of Pub. HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API