Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Marshall (In Re Marshall)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided December 29, 2000No. Bankruptcy No. LA 96-12510-SB. Adversary No. 96-01838-SBPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
SAMUEL L. BUFFORD, Bankruptcy Judge.
Trial in this adversary proceeding took place in October and November, 1999. It has come time to resolve the remaining issues in this adversary proceeding, and to issue a judgment. This opinion addresses three issues: (1) whether the alleged probate exception to federal jurisdiction applies to this adversary proceeding; (2) whether this is a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and (3) what form the judgment in this adversary proceeding should take.
A. Jurisdiction
E. Pierce Marshall continues to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Langenkamp v. CulpSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- In Re Castlerock Properties, Debtor. Piombo Corporation, a California Corporation v. Castlerock Properties, a California Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cadle Company v. James Moore, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Elaine Marshall v. J. Marshall, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Marshall v. Marshall (In Re Marshall)District Court, C.D. California · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.