United States ex rel. Morgan & Son Earth Moving, Inc. v. Timberland Paving & Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
Morgan & Son (“Morgan”) brought this action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d (1982), to recover the balance due on an excavation subcontract with Timberland Paving & Construction Co. (“Timberland”). Timberland counterclaimed for indemnity against possible liability arising from Morgan’s alleged over-excavation. After trial, the district court awarded Morgan damages and dismissed the counterclaim. We affirm the dismissal of the counterclaim and reverse and remand for recalculation of the damage award.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Timberland was the general…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Grace Bros. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Dakota County v. GliddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Marion J. Woods, Director of the State Department of Social Services v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stanton Road Associates v. Lohrey Enterprises, Electronic Valet Systems, Inc., David Lohrey, Nathan PangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Bergen v. F/V St. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Willie H. Harris, Ernestine Harris v. Polskie Linie Lotnicze, AKA Lot Polish Airlines, a Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Vance v. American Hawaii Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Marina Milicevic, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Fletcher Jones Imports, Ltd. Mercedes-Benz Usa, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.