Legal Opinion

Hoffmann v. Hoffmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Concededly defendant abandoned plaintiff. The crucial question is whether this conduct was justified. The record discloses much right and some wrong on both sides. This marriage seems to have been founded upon mutual affection and respect, which to some extent still remains and upon which it would seem that with reasonable mutual concessions a new marital life might fairly be begun. We must, however, decide the controversy and not plan the future. While there was some provocation for the abandonment, we think it did not amount to justification. The harsh letters written in 1924 by the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Salk v. SalkNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API