Legal Opinion

J.H. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2001No. S-09471PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I,. INTRODUCTION

Jane Hart's parental rights to her three-year-old daughter, Jenny, were terminated by the superior court. 1 This case presents the questions whether the Department of Health and Social Services (the department) was estopped from petitioning for termination of Jane's parental rights and whether the trial court's factual findings supporting termination are clearly erroneous. Because the court's findings are not clearly erroneous and the evidence does not warrant estoppel and because applying estoppel against the state would in any event violate the public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. SchneiderAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. A.B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bergstrom v. LindbackAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. R.J.M. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lucy J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Carl N. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hannah B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Thea G. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Karrie B. Ex Rel. Reep v. CATHERINE J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API