Legal Opinion

Divelbiss v. Jones

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1932No. 30234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The appellant sued Burns, the maker of, and Jones, an indorser on, a promissory note. The note was executed by Burns to Jones, and transferred by Jones to the appellant by the indorsement on the back thereof, reading as follows: “This is to certify that I have this day sold all my right, title and interest, to the within note and mortgage to L. B. Divelbiss, as part payment on radio.” The appellees’ contention is that this indorsement was intended to be “without recourse,” and therefore he is not liable thereon.

This is the second appearance of the case in this court. On the former appeal,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Humphreys County v. CashinMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hawkins v. ShieldsMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Divelbiss v. BurnsMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Baskerville & Whitfield v. HarrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Campe v. RenandineMississippi Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Valley Mills, Division of Merchants Co. v. Southeastern HatcheriesMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Continental Gin Co. v. FreemanDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API