Legal Opinion

Ross v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 2, 1983No. 81 Civ. 3078 (KTD)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:

Plaintiff, William Ross, moves for a default judgment against the defendants United States of America, United States Parole Commission (“USPC”), Warden of the Marion Penitentiary, Lawrence A. Carpenter, Maurice H. Sigler, Curtis C. Crawford, George J. Reed, and Thomas R. Holscaw for their delay in answering plaintiff’s complaint. Defendants -oppose this motion and cross-move for dismissal, asserting lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction, insufficiency of process, and improper venue. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brendan Gilmore v. Shearson/american Express Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Jones v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  3. Chahram Pahlavi v. Petros PalandjianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Palandjian v. PahlaviDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  5. United States v. Yonkers Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API