Legal Opinion

Fickes v. Wireman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1834PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR to the common pleas of Mams county. This action was brought in the court of common pleas of Adams county by the defendant in error, James Wireman, to recover a legacy bequeathed to him by the will of his father, John Wireman deceased.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the common pleas of Mams county. This action was brought in the court of common pleas of Adams county by the defendant in error, James Wireman, to recover a legacy bequeathed to him by the will of his father, John Wireman deceased. The testator, by his will, dated the 11th of July, and proved the 8th of September following, in the year 1804, inter alia, bequeathed as follows, to wit: “ it is my will that the rest of my movable estate be sold to pay my lawful debts, but no rails shall be considered as movable; and if any money be left after my just debts and funeral charges be paid,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Kennedy, J.

The settlement, by the executors, in 1809, has reference to the inventory, and the balance of 1073 dollars 12 cents found in their hands is stated to include the accounts due to the testator from the several legatees, “ as entered on the inventory.” It is said the inventory was not produced on the trial; nor does it appear, from the statement given of the evidence, that it was. On the face of the administration account, as stated on settlement, the executors are charged with the amount of the inventory, without giving the items contained in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Porter's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API