Legal Opinion
Sprague v. Zeck
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 1937No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We are of one mind that the evidence in this record demonstrates that the questions of negligence and contributory negligence were for the jury. Nothing would be gained by a detailed recital of the facts, as that is all the motion for judgment n. o. v. calls for.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- McKniff v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Stranko v. SugermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963