Legal Opinion

Witt v. Merrill Et Ux

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1953No. 6740_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a motion to docket and dismiss an appeal on the ground that it was not taken within the thirty days allowed by rule 73(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. It appears that the notice of appeal was duly filed within thirty days of the denial of a motion for a new trial made by appellant but more than thirty days after the entry of the judgment in the case.

When the jury returned a verdict for defendant on March 6, 1953, counsel for plaintiff immediately made a motion for a new trial in open court and had it entered on the record. The court did not pass on the motion at that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. BUTCHERS'BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing and Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Bowman v. LoperenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Memphis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Fine v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Meriwether v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Martinez v. TrainorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. Martinez v. TrainorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Campus Sweater & Sportswear Co. v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  5. Mindy Taragan v. Eli Lilly and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API