Turney v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM MADISON. Appeal from the Circuit -Court of Madison County to the Court, of Civil Appeals, and by. writ of certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court, —hi. R. BaRhah, Circuit Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
The arguments of the attorneys in this case relate to' two phases of the law bearing on an infant’s disaffirmance of his contract of settlement of a personal injury claim, pleaded as an accord and satisfaction.
The first phase involves a point discussed, but that may be said to have been by way of obiter, or to have been reserved from decision, in the case of Lane v. Dayton, etc., Co., 101 Tenn., 581, 48 S. W., 1094, whether an averment that the consideration, received by the infant in satisfaction, had been expended or was not on hand, will excuse tender or return of the amount, so as to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Craig v. Van BebberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- MacGreal v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LascaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Wuller v. Chuse Grocery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Vogelsang v. NullTexas Supreme Court · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manning v. American Clothing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Glover v. L. N.R.R. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Tuck Ex Rel. Latham v. PayneTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. CarilloArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- McDonald v. CadyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928