Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Countryside Pud Residential Homeowners

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 21, 2000No. 5D99-1103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Sharp, J.

The Robertsons, Edward and Theresa, appeal from a summary final judgment entered against them in a suit brought by Countryside PUD Residential Homeowners Association, Inc. (Countryside), to enforce covenants and restrictions of record. Based on his reading of the covenants and restrictions alone, the trial judge ruled, as a matter of law, the Rob-ertsons could not keep a brown roof on their home since it had not been approved by the two architect review committees, and that they must remove it and replace it with one having Hearthstone grey shingles. We reverse because we think there are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holl v. TalcottSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Flamingo Ranch Est., Inc. v. Sunshine Ranches H., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Colton v. Silsbee State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1997
  5. Engvalson v. WebsterSupreme Court of Florida · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Payne v. CUDJOE GARDENS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. 8425 BISCAYNE LLC v. PINNACLE TOWERS LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API