Legal Opinion
Rose v. Clinton
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 5, 1991No. 90-1241PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
575 So.2d 751 (1991)
Stephen H. ROSE and Consolidated Dyeing, Inc., Appellants,
v.
James J. CLINTON, III, Appellee.
No. 90-1241.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 5, 1991.
Michael I. Rose, James F. Pollack, Miami, for appellants.
Mark A. Kamilar, Miami, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.
BASKIN, Judge.
Defendants Consolidated Dyeing, Inc., and Stephen H. Rose, a Consolidated shareholder, appeal a final judgment. In accordance with a jury verdict, the court entered an Interim Order finding that plaintiff James Clinton III was a shareholder of Consolidated and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. TuberoSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Lazare v. WeissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Delta Info. Serv., Inc. v. JOSEPH JANNACH MD & ASSOCIATESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harper-Elder v. ElderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Rodriguez v. Thermal Dynamics, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Tico Insurance Company v. SchonningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Bator v. GouldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991