Font v. Sana Investment, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
After a thorough review of the record and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm. Appellant failed to address the question of whether he satisfied the jurisdictional minimum amount in controversy, even after being directed to do so by the lower court in its show-cause order, and he has similarly failed to address the issue in his appellate brief. Thus, the argument is forfeited. See United States v. Fernandez, 145 F.3d 59, 63 (1st Cir.1998) (issues not fully addressed in appellate submissions are deemed forfeited); Martinez v. Colon, *3254 F.3d 980, 990 (1st Cir.1995) (argument not addressed below…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilfredo Martinez, A/K/A Wilfredo Martinez Rodriguez v. Rafael Colon, A/K/A Rafael Colon PizarroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Orlando FernandezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- David M. Schlessinger v. George SalimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Conjugal Partnership Comprised by Jones v. Conjugal Partnership Comprised by PinedaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lopez, Jr. v. AmbroDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020