Legal Opinion
In Re Grimm
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 7, 1994No. 19-10247PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MARTIN V.B. BOSTETTER, Jr., Chief Judge.
At issue in this matter is whether the record should be reopened on remand. In March 1993, the Court approved the fourth and final fee application of the law firm of David & Hagner, P.C. over the objections of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The fees were for services rendered by David & Hagner in defending Gary and Ann Grimm (the “Grimms”) against a dischargeability suit brought by the FDIC. The FDIC appealed from the order awarding fees. The District Court then remanded the matter with instructions to make a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bill Greever Corp. v. Tazewell National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- In Re Professional Coatings (N.A.), Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- In Re Wizard Software, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Arizona Tomato, L.L.C. v. Guccione (In Re Guccione)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- In Re: Dennis Harker, Debtor. Dennis Harker v. United States of America (Acting Through the Internal Revenue Service)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.