Legal Opinion

People v. Morillo

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1979No. Docket 77-2358PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Where defendant is charged in Federal proceedings with conspiracy to transport stolen goods in interstate commerce and at the close of the government’s case in Federal court is acquitted thereof, and thereafter is charged in the state court with conspiracy to receive and conceal the identical stolen goods, does such action in the state court constitute double jeopardy? On June 24, 1977, the Wayne County Circuit Court held the state’s action was not double jeopardy, and defendant appeals of right.

In late 1975, defendant and codefendants were charged with a five-count Federal indictment for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. TylerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. MorilloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. WattMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API