Legal Opinion
Zivitz v. Centennial Road Properties, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 18, 1984No. 844PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMILIA, Judge:
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the lower court properly struck appellant’s counterclaim for failure to meet the requirements of Pa.R.C.P. 1031(a) where the counterclaim arose from the allegedly tortious manner in which appellees instituted an assumpsit action against appellant for breach of a construction contract.
Appellees, the plaintiffs below, filed a complaint in assumpsit in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County against, among others, appellant, Centennial Road Properties, Inc., alleging breach of contract in the construction of their house.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ORSATTI, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. Umet TrustCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Bloom v. Devonian Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Kaskie v. KaskieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by14 opinions
- Danko Development Corp. v. Econocast Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fidelity Bank v. DudenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Clark v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Duquesne Light Co. v. U.S. Industrial Fabricators, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Carroll Township Authority v. Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.