State v. Beckroge
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Earre, J., Charleston, June, 1896. Three indictments respectively against J. H. Beckroge, E. Perano, and J. A. Bertucci, in the following form: At a Court of General Sesssions begun and holden in and for the County of , in the State of South Carolina, at Court House, in the county and State aforesaid, on the Monday of , in the year of our Eord 189 , the jurors of and for the county aforesaid, in the State aforesaid, upon their oath, present: That , at Court House, in…
Read the full summary
Before Earre, J., Charleston, June, 1896. Three indictments respectively against J. H. Beckroge, E. Perano, and J. A. Bertucci, in the following form: At a Court of General Sesssions begun and holden in and for the County of , in the State of South Carolina, at Court House, in the county and State aforesaid, on the Monday of , in the year of our Eord 189 , the jurors of and for the county aforesaid, in the State aforesaid, upon their oath, present: That , at Court House, in the county of and State aforesaid, on the day of , in the year of our Eord 189 , and on divers other days, both before…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Pope.
In the above entitled causes, tried *486in the Ccmrt of General Sessions for Charleston County, in this State, at the June term, 1896, of said Court, before Judge Earle and a jury, each defendant was found guilty of maintaining a nuisance, under what is known as the dispensary law of this State, and after conviction were duly sentenced. Thereupon each one of the three defendants above named, and each in his own cause, appealed to this Court. A copy of the indictment and the exceptions thereto must be set out in the report.
As will appear by…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- State v. HarrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927