Legal Opinion

Floyd v. New York State Urban Development Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel J. Silverman, J.

Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is denied. Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted to the extent of awarding judgment declaring that subdivision (3) of section 16 of the New York State Urban Development Corporation Act (L. 1968, eh. 174) is valid and constitutional insofar as it purports to exempt projects of the Urban Development Corp. from zoning laws and regulations and other local laws and regulations of cities, towns and villages of the State, and in particular of the Village of Ossining, (a) The act deals with matters of State concern and is thus not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Valvo v. Urban Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. MiceliNew Rochelle City Court · 1973
  3. Krebs v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Krebs v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. O'Brien v. Troy Urban Renewal AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API