Legal Opinion

Bartels v. Huff

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1933No. 9209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by plaintiffs in error against defendant in error seeking a foreclosure of an alleged lien on certain land located in Willacy county. The lien is alleged to have been created by the abstracting of a judgment. Defendant in error’s sole defense is that the land involved is his homestead.

The record discloses, among other things, that the land involved herein embraces about 161 acres; that there is no house on the land; that defendant in error owns no other land and intends to make this land his home. He had cleared some 22 acres, drilled two wells, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Jackson Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Teller v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gregory v. Sunbelt Savings, F.S.B., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. PaineWebber, Inc. v. MurrayDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
  3. Houston Lumber Supply Company v. WockenfussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Simank v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Simank v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API