Legal Opinion

People v. Copeland

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 29, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order reversed on the law and motion to suppress denied.

Defendant was arrested for being an unlicensed operator (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 509). A search of his person revealed a hypodermic instrument as well as heroin. He moved to suppress the evidence and the motion was granted (see 77 Misc 2d 649), resulting in this appeal by the People.

In People v Marsh (20 NY2d 98), where defendant was arrested on a traffic infraction pursuant to a warrant, the Court of Appeals held that a search may not be conducted as incident to a lawful traffic arrest. This rule was reiterated in People…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. People v. PerelNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. CortesNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API