United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. Scofield
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Defendant argues that this court should refuse to enforce the lower court judgment because to do so would violate certain rights conferred upon Scofield by the Wisconsin Employment Peace Act (ch. Ill, Stats.). His argument thus rests upon the correctness of his assertion that state labor law is applicable. Since both the state and the United States have passed labor relations laws, the possibility of conflict arises. Under the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution, the state labor law is obliged to give way to a contrary federal policy. Yet, it is clear that states have been by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Scofield v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- LOCAL 248 UAW v. NatzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Shetney v. ShetneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 986 v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Browne v. Milwaukee Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Attoe v. Madison Professional Policemen's Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Casumpang v. ILWU LOCAL 142Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- Communications Workers Local 7400 v. AbrahamsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.