Legal Opinion

Archenhold Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1920No. 6139PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Fact.

BRADX, J.

Appellant, the Archenhold Company, a corporation, sued the defendants, A. E. Smith, J. P. FUlton, J. W. Sykes, R. L. Rich, J. W. Atkerson, J. E. Ashcraft, and C. A. Pevehouse, to recover a joint and several judgment against Smith, Atkerson, Fulton, Ashcraft, and Pevehouse, as principals, and against the defendants Rich and Sykes as in-dorsers, upon a certain promissory note. The petition alleged the execution and delivery of the note to Sykes and Rich by the other defendants, and the indorsement and delivery of same by the payees to appellant. The note contained this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michigan Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AtteberyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. State Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth v. VickeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  3. Gregory v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Smith v. PickhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Hermes v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brinker v. First Nat. Bank of ClevelandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Darby v. Farmers' State Bank of BurkburnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Bank of Conway v. StaryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. TomsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Sloan v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API