ROJAS
Board of Immigration Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2444 MATTER OF ROJAS In Deportation Proceedings A-20974502 Decided by Board October 29, 1975 (1) Where respondent's testimony at the deportation hearing, at which she was repre- sented by counsel, without more, clearly establishes her deportability, inquiry into the facts surrounding respondent's initial interrogation and arrest and the allegation of illegally obtained evidence of deportability is necessary. (2) Where the presence in the United States of a lawful permanent resident sister is the only significaAt favorable factor presented by respondent in support of her…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- In the Matter of Francesco Paolo La Franca v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- BURGOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
- Alfredo Guzman-Flores v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service, Pedro Castellanos-Castillo v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- George Peter Klissas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Khosrow Gharib Rashtabadi v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- DASSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
- SHIRDELBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1984
- PINZONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2013
- FLORESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.