Legal Opinion
Compuware Corp. v. Moody's Investors Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 7, 2004No. Civ. 03-70247PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Compuware Corporation (“Compuware”) moves for partial reconsideration of my opinion of June 10, 2004, arguing that I was mistaken in my finding that Defendant Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) would qualify for protection as a journalist under the New York reporter’s privilege statute. For the reasons below, the motion is DENIED. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In my opinion of June 10, 1994, I found that In re Fitch, 330 F.3d 104 (2nd Cir. 2003), was clearly distinguishable from the present case and therefore Moody’s qualified as a journalist…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jefferson County School District No. R-1 v. Moody's Investor's Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Fitch, Inc., Appellant-Cross-Appellee, American Savings Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ubs Painewebber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Pan Am Corp. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (In Re Pan Am Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Scott v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Compuware Corp. v. Moody's Investors Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005