Legal Opinion
Ford v. Hagel
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 13, 1996No. 14425-9-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
Real estate purchaser Frances M. Ford filed a complaint to set aside a contract forfeiture obtained against her by the sellers, Wayne and Nadine Hagel. On cross motions for summary judgment, the court granted the Hagels’ motion and dismissed the complaint. Ms. Ford appeals. Because there are issues of material fact concerning the Hagels’ right to declare forfeiture when they purported to do so, the court should not have granted summary judgment in their favor. We reverse and remand.
In May 1989 Ms. Ford entered into a real estate contract with the Hagels for the purchase of approximately 320…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Barrie v. Hosts of America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Detweiler v. J. C. Penney Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Hiatt v. Walker Chevrolet Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Washington Federation of State Employees, Council 28 v. Office of Financial ManagementWashington Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Infrax Systems, Inc. v. WoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015